a massachusetts lawyer argued before the state supreme court that taking pictures up women's skirts is protected by the first amendment. if the lawyer and her client could win on this, it could be another -- >> victory for provo. >> robinson was busted for snapping up skirt pictures on the subway. but a lady says because underwear made sure no private parts were seen, the peeping tom laws would -- quote if a person reveals a body part whether intention air or unintentionable cannot expect privacy. say a woman is breastfeeding in public or a journalist takes a picture, the person who takes a picture can be charged with the same thing. oh the breastfeeding clause. i forgot about that. discuss -- >> lightning rooooouuunnndd. lightning round. >> remi, as a female lawyer which you claim to be and one who defends creeps why would this woman defend this guy in his first amendment? >> i will disagree with some of the premise of your question there. i will say everyone is entitled to a defense. if this gentleman was -- maybe he is not a gentleman. if this person was charged with an offense he i